Are you a Sucker?
This may sound like a silly question, but let's face it: there are lots of stupid people in the world. So I've created a simple test, which if you fail, confirms that you are a sucker.
TEST: Should paid shills' rationalizations of the conclusion they were tasked with supporting be given equal consideration when opposed by multiple, nonpartial scientific studies?
If you answered yes, then you are a sucker.
UPDATE: Ladies and Gentleman, we have our first contestant. His name is Chris Reed and he is a sucker. But Reed goes beyond being a sucker and actually says that he believes the shills more than nonpartial, scientific studies.
If anyone wants to have some fun with Mr. Reed, I recommend telling him the election is just around the corning and counting how many times he circles the block.
One of the benefits of Proposition 89 is that it cuts out unnecessary middle men. With clean money and a level playing field, ideas can be judged by the content, not by how much money was spent paying to distribute the message. Under such circumstances, the San Diego Union-Tribune editorial board would be at a great disadvantage.








